Back to Pulpit Magazine Index
Principle versus Preference
Tuesday, Jul 14, 2009
(By Lance Quinn)
It is for the good of the local church that Elders work together toward the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace (Ephesians 4:3). When possible, Elders should manifest this unity by attempting to make unanimous decisions regarding both the nature and function of the local church body, Jesus Christ being her ultimate spiritual Head. When it comes to the nature of the church, Elders should make decisions based upon the principles laid out in the Word of God. This practically means that principled decisions which are achieved by proper and sound exegesis can and do reflect affirmations in unanimity because the Elders are submitting their wills to Holy Scripture, ensuring the Holy Spirit’s illumining role in the church’s male leadership, and thus securing a healthy course of action for the strengthening of the corporate body (Ephesians 4:4-16). The very nature of the church is said by the apostle Paul to be the “pillar and buttress of truth” (1 Timothy 3:15).
When it comes to the function of the church however, with the Elders being called upon to make judgments on preferential issues, unanimity is desired but not required. Issues of preference within the local body are precisely what the apostle Paul refers to when he declared to the Roman believers of the 1st century: “Each [person] should be fully convinced in his own mind” (Romans 14:5). When preferences are being considered, Paul teaches the body—including the Elders—to “pursue what makes for peace and for mutual upbuilding” (Romans 14:19). The same apostle is therefore calling both for unity in essentials and flexibility in non-essentials.
The Elders of any local congregation may differ in their understanding and application of areas which have no explicit or implicit mandate for leadership unanimity. Such freedom then should lead these men to pray and implore one another to consider all possible alternatives in order to achieve unanimity. In the absence of any desired unanimity, disagreements in matters of preference don’t inherently militate against the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. The church, through its leadership, should strive for essential unity in doctrine and practice, but should not become paralyzed because of the lack of preferential unanimity. Unanimity must be achieved in principles; differences may exist in preferences without destroying unity; charity must predominate in both.