Back to Pulpit Magazine Index

OT Saints: Indwelt by the Spirit?
Wednesday, Sep 23, 2009

(By Mark Zhakevich)

While attending the Feast of Booths, Jesus exclaimed, “If anyone is thirsty, let him come to Me and drink.  He who believes in Me, as the Scripture said, ‘From his innermost being will flow rivers of living water.’”  The apostle John comments that “this He spoke of the Spirit, whom those who believed in Him were to receive; for the Spirit was not yet given, because Jesus was not yet glorified” (John 7:37–39).  The latter part of this verse has generated no small amount of discussion in church history.  In what sense was the Spirit “not yet given”? (Literally in the Greek, “the Spirit was not.”)   Although some see this text as support for a lack of the Holy Spirit’s indwelling of OT believers, there are three reasons why we can affirm the Spirit’s indwelling of OT saints: regeneration, sanctification, and empowerment.

Regeneration

Regeneration can be defined as “a secret act of God in which he imparts new spiritual life to us” [1] and this process is the work of the Holy Spirit (John 3:3–8).  If depravity is universal (Rom 3:9–23) and justification is apart from works (Rom 3:20), then OT saints (e.g. Noah and Abraham) were justified solely by the work of the Holy Spirit (Gen 6:9, Rom 4:3).  Otherwise, how were individuals before Christ justified? 

The Holy Spirit has always been the regenerating agent. Although the OT does not explicitly use NT terminology of regeneration, [2] Larry Pettegrew observes that “circumcise your heart” (Deut 10:16, 30:6: Ezek 44:7, 9) is the OT reference for regeneration. [3] Deuteronomy 30:6 shows that love for God is a result of a circumcised heart.  Similarly, in 1 John, love for God is a byproduct of fellowship with God, which occurs after regeneration. Effectively, John is saying unless you are born of God, you cannot love Him.  In the OT, circumcision of the heart preceded love for God; in the NT, regeneration precedes a love for God, both of which are a result of the work of the agent of regeneration, the Holy Spirit.

Sanctification

OT indwelling is also affirmed by holy lives of OT saints.  Arthur Pink summarizes the complete and instantaneous process of regeneration, leading to holiness, in this way: “Regeneration consists in a radical change of heart, for there is implanted a new disposition as the foundation of all holy exercises; the mind being renovated, the affections elevated, and the will emancipated from the bondage of sin.” [4] After the Holy Spirit regenerates, it is difficult to imagine that He would leave that individual to rely on his own ability to produce the fruit of the Spirit.  Paul teaches that no one can live by the law of God unless the Spirit of God lives within him or her (Rom 8:2–17, Gal 5:16–26). 

A glimpse into the lives of OT saints confirms that they did not carry out the desires of the flesh.  Genesis 6:9 presents Noah as a “righteous man, blameless in his time” who walked with God.  Likewise, Job is described as blameless, upright, God fearing, and turning away from evil (Job 1:1, 8; 2:3).  Hebrews 11 is a gallery of OT saints who lived in the power of the Spirit. Since regeneration and holiness are works of the Spirit, any ongoing evidence of holy living must also be done in the power of the Holy Spirit. Leon Wood helpfully summarizes this truth when he says “since these OT saints . . . remained in a regenerate condition, it must have been the Holy Spirit who kept them so.” [5]

Since faith is a gift of God (Eph 2:8) and sanctification is a work of God (Phil 2:12–13), an OT saint’s continual display of the fruits of the Spirit leads to the conclusion that the Spirit indwelt that person, producing the fruit that is pleasing to God and proving genuine faith.

Empowerment

The Holy Spirit’s empowerment of the OT saints for ministry is the final proof of indwelling.  There are numerous examples in the OT that demonstrate the Spirit coming upon certain men for ministry.  The examples can be divided into three categories: craftsmanship, administration, and prophecy. 

Exodus 31:1–5 describes Bezalel being filled with the Spirit of God for the purpose of artistry in the tabernacle. Judges, kings and civic rulers were also filled with the Spirit of God to accomplish the administrative duties required of them.  Samson was chosen by God to resist the Philistines (Judg 14:19).  Joshua was empowered by the Spirit to assist Moses in leading the Israelites (Num 27:18).  1 Samuel 16:13 describes David under the guidance of the Spirit of Yahweh following his anointing as the king of Israel. Prophets were also filled with the Spirit of God (2 Chron 15:1–7, Mic 3:8) and prophesied, resurrected the dead (1 Kgs 17:17–24), and performed supernatural works (2 Kgs 1:10).  These miracles glorified God and were committed in the power of the Spirit. 

The Meaning of John 7:39

If regeneration, sanctification, and empowerment affirm OT indwelling of believers, what is the meaning of John 7:39? What is the meaning of “the Spirit was not”? 

Jesus is saying that in comparison to the Spirit’s upcoming work, His prior activity made it seem as if He was not active on the earth. Leon Morris writes that “there is nothing that we can compare with the activity of the apostolic age.  Then it was ‘Spirit’ in a way it had never been before.” [6] H. F. Woodhouse adds that “the power revealed at Pentecost was so amplified that it was as though till then the Spirit had not been acting.” [7] Woodhouse makes an analogy with an athlete who after performing extremely well in a game is said to “have arrived” or that he “was unknown until now.”  This does not mean that the athlete has never played or played successfully, rather that his current performance is much better than previous competitions; it is as if he were unknown until now. [8] Likewise, although the Spirit acted in the past, His outpouring and explosive activity at Pentecost becomes so much greater that it could be said that He was not active in the same extent.

For example, He is (1) the comforter, (2) a witness to Christ, and (3) one who glorifies Christ. [9] All three of these roles were commenced after Jesus’ ascension. In the OT, the Spirit of God is never described as the comforter, [10] or a witness and glorifier of Christ.  He testifies to Jesus’ death and resurrection through the Scriptures, apostles, and the church. [11] Similarly, the Spirit could not glorify Christ to the full extent until after ascension. All the events related to the mission of Christ were completed and now the Holy Spirit had all the historical events of redemption to refer back to in His work of regeneration, sanctification, empowerment of people and glorification of Christ so that He now operated as He had never done before. The Holy Spirit “was not” in the sense that He was not as majestically active in the OT as He would be post-ascension.

Both the OT and NT present the Holy Spirit as the only regenerating agent in the plan of redemption, the sole agent of sanctification—working in the hearts of OT and NT believers, convicting them of sin and producing genuine God worshippers—and as the only agent of empowerment, enabling the saints of both testaments to live holy lives which are acceptable to God.  He continues to fulfill this role in us today as He had done from the beginning of time.  The extent of His work in believers has increased, but He was always in believers and among believers.

* * * * *
ENDNOTES:

[1] Wayne Grudem, Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan Publishing House, 2000), 699. 

[2] “Born again” appears to be the terminology used in the NT to describe regeneration by the Holy Spirit.  Cf. John 3:3, 7; 1 Peter 1:3, 23. 

[3] Larry D. Pettegrew, The New Covenant Ministry of the Holy Spirit, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Kregel Publications, 2001), 26.  

[4] Arthur W. Pink, The Holy Spirit (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Guardian Press, 1970), 49.

[5] Leon Wood, The Holy Spirit, 70. 

[6] Leon Morris, The Gospel According to John (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1971), 427.

[7] H. F. Woodhouse, “Hard Sayings-IX: The Holy Ghost Was Not Yet Given,” Theology 67 (1964): 311.

[8] Ibid.

[9] Gary Fredricks, “Rethinking the Role of the Holy Spirit in the Lives of Old Testament Believers,” Trinity Journal 9, no. 1 (1988): 99-101.

[10] The Greek term for comforter and helper is parakaleto which occurs once in the LXX in Job 16:12, where a reference is made to Job’s friends being his “comforters.”  G. Braumann, “ Advocate, Paraclete, Helper,” NIDNTT, 1:89.    

[11] Fredricks, 101.

Posted by Pulpit Magazine   |  Tags Theology

17 Responses to OT Saints: Indwelt by the Spirit?


Posted by Michael Luehrmann   |  Wednesday, Sep 23, 2009   

Great post Mark. Sinclair Ferguson has some very helpful thoughts on this in his book on the Holy Spirit. He would hold the same view and gives some good discussion to John 7.39. It is not that the Spirit didn't indwell, but that he didn't indwell as the Spirit of the risen and ascended Christ, as he does now.

Posted by Brian Sayers   |  Wednesday, Sep 23, 2009   

Thanks Mark. Well put and documented. I have explained this dynamic to my congregation as "the same indwelling 'in kind,' but different in degree or manifestation." That phraseology seems to have helped some, and I'm pretty sure someone else taught it to me, so I won't take credit.
Brian
http://cafebiblia.com
http://www.redbarnchurch.org

Posted by David Ellingson   |  Wednesday, Sep 23, 2009   

I'd recommend the following book, which offers a different position than you've given here. It makes a distinction between the Spirit's work of regeneration and the Spirit's work of Indwelling. He argues very convincingly that OT saints were regenerated (or heart circumcised) but NOT indwelt. This did not occur until after the glorification of Jesus.

God's Indwelling Presence: The Holy Spirit in the Old and New Testaments (Nac Studies in Bible & Theology) (Hardcover) by: James M. Hamilton, Jr.


Synopsis: The question of the role of the Holy Spirit in the lives of the Old Testament saints is a difficult and complicated one, which has received a variety of different answers from within the Reformed community. In God's Indwelling Presence, James M. Hamilton, Jr. undertakes to trace out a biblical theology from the whole testimony of the scriptures, but most particularly the Gospel of John, in order to discover a biblically-consistent testimony regarding Old Testament pneumatology; the result is a thorough, up-to-date, and compelling case for a position which may be surprising to some, but in support of which Hamilton has laid out some very compelling evidence. All in all, this is a very insightful and engaging work, and deserves a reading far beyond the borders of the scholarly community.

The sharp disjunction the evangelist draws between the Holy Spirit's work before and after the glorification of Christ, particularly in John 7:39 and 14:17, can be a little baffling to many of a Reformed persuasion, who recognize the necessity of the Spirit's life-giving work for the faith and salvation of anyone – including the Old Testament saints, who like us were born dead in trespasses and sins. Furthermore, on the surface these passages seem to be in contradiction to other parts of John, including Jesus' dialogue with Nicodemus, in which he impresses upon him the necessity of the Spirit's work in regeneration, and expresses disapproval that Nicodemus is not already aware of this truth from the Old Testament scriptures.
This apparent contradiction has led to some confusing and obscure interpretations of John 7:39 and 14:17, as well as to some tenuous positions on Old Testament pneumatology. But according to Hamilton, much of the confusion results from an unnecessary blending together of two distinct works of the Spirit, regeneration and indwelling. Regeneration is a work which the Spirit has done throughout redemptive history, and corresponds to heart circumcision in the Old Testament; individual indwelling is a promised eschatological blessing confirmed only after the glorification of Christ. And the isolated examples of certain prominent individuals who were apparently indwelt in the Old Testament, when considered thoughtfully, do not pose a threat to this general paradigm.

http://www.amazon.com/Gods-Indwelling-Presence-Testaments-Theology/dp/0805443835
http://www.gbibooks.com/details.aspx?id=0805443835

In His Grace,
David Ellingson

Posted by David Ellingson   |  Wednesday, Sep 23, 2009   

http://sites.google.com/site/delightinthelawofthelord/

Posted by mark zhakevich   |  Wednesday, Sep 23, 2009   

David,
Thank you for that recommendation. I will take a look at that book.
Mark

Posted by Timothy Shumate   |  Wednesday, Sep 23, 2009   

I have heard people use the following verse to say that the "Holy Spirit" came along side but did not indwell in the O.T.


Jdg 16:20 She said, "The Philistines are upon you, Samson!" And he awoke from his sleep and said, "I will go out as at other times and shake myself free." But he did not know that the LORD had departed from him.

1Sa 16:14 Now the Spirit of the LORD departed from Saul, and an evil spirit from the LORD terrorized him.

If what way did the Spirit depart from Saul. Is it in how the Spirit empowered or the indwelling?

Good post generating some good questions for me.

Any thoughts or comments on this.

In His Service,

Posted by don sands   |  Wednesday, Sep 23, 2009   

"He continues to fulfill this role in us today as He had done from the beginning of time. The extent of His work in believers has increased, but He was always in believers and among believers."

Amen.

Good teaching and food for thought. The workings of the Spirit of God has such depth in doctrine: baptism, filling, etc. And so there's much confusion, and error.

And I stills truggle with the study of pneumatology, and probably shall until the Spirit takes me to be with Jesus.

Posted by mark zhakevich   |  Wednesday, Sep 23, 2009   

Timothy,

I would say that both of the passages you mentioned refer to the Spirit's empowerment rather than indwelling. Verses like these is precisely why I included my third point (empowerment) because the Spirit seems to temporarily work through various persons in the OT (e.g. Saul, Samson, even David -Psa 51:11-I believe David refers to empowerment not indwelling in this passage) and then depart.

Mark

Posted by Timothy Shumate   |  Wednesday, Sep 23, 2009   

Thanks Mark, that is harmony with my thoughts as well. It is always good to check our thoughts with others, it keeps us within orthodox teaching. Thanks Brother.

In His Service,
Tim S.

Posted by Chris Cookston   |  Thursday, Sep 24, 2009   

Mark,

Thank you for this post.

In my thinking the more references one has the better, so here is an article that I really like on this same topic.

"Were Old Testament Believers Indwelt by The Spirit?" by, Robert V. McCabe. Detroit Baptist Seminary Journal; 9:1 (Fall 2004)

And here is a snippet from Dr. McCabe's conclusion:

"In the final analysis, if men have been totally depraved since the Fall and if God has chosen to save any of Adam’s descendants, then the Spirit, in coordination with the proclamation of God’s message of salvation, must impart new life at regeneration and sustain this saving relationship through indwelling. If Old Testament saints were not indwelt, then they had not been regenerated and they were still “dead in trespasses and sin.” As McCune has aptly summarized the Spirit’s indwelling work in the Old Testament: “Just as the evidence of spiritual fellowship and communion with God cannot be accounted for without regeneration, neither can they be accounted for without a continuous ministry of the Holy Spirit after the new birth.”190 Therefore, the Spirit’s indwelling ministry was a necessity for Old Testament saints, just as it is for New Testament saints."

Keep up the good work Mark. Thanks again!

Chris

Posted by Luke Moore   |  Thursday, Sep 24, 2009   

Another OT example,
Psalm 51:11 - Do not cast me away from Your presence, and do not take Your Holy Spirit from me.

Posted by Jesse Johnson   |  Thursday, Sep 24, 2009   

I agree with Athaliah in 2 Kings 11:14.

Posted by don sands   |  Friday, Sep 25, 2009   

"That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Do not marvel that I said to you, ‘You must be born again.’ The wind blows where it wishes, and you hear its sound, but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes. So it is with everyone who is born of the Spirit.”

Nicodemus said to him, “How can these things be?” Jesus answered him, “Are you the teacher of Israel and yet you do not understand these things?"

"You, however, are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if in fact the Spirit of God dwells in you. Anyone who does not have the Spirit of Christ does not belong to him. "

"By faith Moses, when he was grown up, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh's daughter, choosing rather to be mistreated with the people of God than to enjoy the fleeting pleasures of sin. He considered the reproach of Christ greater wealth than the treasures of Egypt, for he was looking to the reward."

Seems the ministry of the Spirit of God, or Holy Spirit, or Spirit of Christ was the same throughout the history of God's people. But of course the Holy Spirit was with Israel and the tabernacle, and then the Temple in His greatest focus, for these were the ethnic people of the Lord, until the Messiah arrived and so torn down the Temple's veil, and the partition between the Jew and Gentile.

Posted by Terry Riordan   |  Friday, Sep 25, 2009   

I disagree with the above article.

Pentecost initiated the INDWELLING of the HS.

The HS was active in the OT, but we read He cam ON them, NOT in them .

The only exception is the artist tasked with building the Tabernacle. There we read that the HS IN-DWELT him

Noah as an example has holes in it. The largest being Gods observations in Genesis

Gen 6:5 ¶ And GOD saw that the wickedness of man [was] great in the earth and [that] every imagination of the thoughts of his heart [was] only evil continually


Gen 6:6 And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth , and it grieved him at his heart


Gen 6:7 And the LORD said , I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth ; both man , and beast , and the creeping thing , and the fowl of the air ; for it repenteth me that I have made them.

Gen 6:8 But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD .


Our salvation does not rest on OUR WORK, but on Gods grace.

Noah was a sinner just like every man that inhabited the world BUT God ordained to save Noah by grace, by His work.

No where in scripture does God tell us the HS indwelt Noah,

The HS seems to have worked on men and their hearts, but not in them , thus the plea of the prophet David, "take not your spirit from me"

Pentecost was just not another day. it was the day God Himself cam to line in us, and promised never to leave us

Posted by Hayden Norris   |  Wednesday, Sep 30, 2009   

Mark,

What does it mean then that Jesus 'baptized in the Spirit' and John 'baptized with water'?

What does Ezekiel 36 mean?

BTW I hope that you are not citing Dr Pettegrew as one that agrees with your interpretation. From what I remember when I read his book in seminary he did make a distinction between indwelling and regeneration much like Hamilton's conclusion.

Thanks for the discussion.

Posted by William du Plooy   |  Tuesday, Oct 27, 2009   

Beloved brethren:
Are we perhaps crossing wirtes here between:
Indwelling in Regeneration (Salvific) and
Enablement of the Spirit (Which is in MEASURE to fullfill works prepared beforehand - Eph 2:8-10)?

We must also recall that the Spirit also was with UNbelievers in the Hebrew Scriptures, to enable thenm to do what was foreordained by YAHWEH; either to detsroy or to give mercy to the National Israel of old.
This was most certainly and defeninately not Regenerating Grace; but momentary to fullfill the Soverign Will of our LORD through these individuals.

So might it be true to say that the Spirit (According with the eternal Covenant of Grace) has from the foundation of the world operated Salvifically in the Elect unto Regeneration in FULL Measure.

Might it be equally true to say that the Spirit has (In general grace and for Sovereign purposes) wored in MEASURE in whomsoever our LORD hsa been pleased to use as a vessel or means to do and fulfill His good and perfect will?

WRT Christ bring to FULLFILLMENT His works in behalf of humanity as Man and then leaving us the Spirt. Would it be possible to say that He then having FULFILLED His role a Man; has given us the Spirit of grace and truth to act as His Internal and Scriptural Witness in FULFILLMENT of His woks?
Did He then give anyone Salvation in MEASURE before Penetcost?
Or did He reveal His Salvific Work only in MEASURE untill Pentecost, and has He NOT always FILLED His Elect in Regeneration with the FULLNESS of the Saving Spirit?

It would be right to conclude that the Spirit is the FULFILLMENT of Messiah's earthly WITNESS in us and by His Scriptures; but we cannot Biblically and experentially conclude that Salvation was ever by any other way than; receiving the FULLNESS of the gift of Regeneration in the FULLNES of Spirit.

As for the Spirit coming upon and departing from an Individual; it would be fair to say that this is not in Regeneration; else our security in Christ (John 10) is void; this must then be a temporary working through an individual who could be Regenerated or even not (As an extention of General Grace and the Sovereignty of our LORD, to accomplish Hs will).

I trust these thoughts make sense?
I am no scholar but do feel strongly about the disparities that are created by us Gentile believers, when we create differences in the mind regarding how God has always worked salvation in the same fashion; in acord with the Trinity's Covenant of Grace unto salvation).
In fact I strongly believe that there is no difference in HOW we are saved from how Abraham, Isaac and Jacob have been Regenerated. The real differences is bewteen perspective; us looking back on FULFILLMENT in Fullness; and them having looked forward with (Perhaps greater) faith in the future PROMISE of Messiah's Fullfillment of His work and His Covenant of Mercy.

Are we experiencing salvation any differently? Is it by any other means? I truly hope none of us believe so - this mercy is eternal and joyous for all the saints.

Your fellow heir in Christ Alone,
W

Posted by Russ Lemay   |  Tuesday, Oct 27, 2009   

The Meaning of John 7:39

"If regeneration, sanctification, and empowerment affirm OT indwelling of believers, what is the meaning of John 7:39? What is the meaning of “the Spirit was not”?"

The “the Spirit was not” provokes the question, Was not what?
Could "the Spirit was not" refer the prophecy of Joel 2 which had not taken place until Acts 2?
Answering the question this way, He was not yet "poured out".

Outpouring is not necessarily the same thing as indwelling.



You must login to add a comment




New To The Fellowship?


Please click the sign up button below to create your free Shepherds' Fellowship Account