Back to Pulpit Magazine Index

Doctrine IS Practical
Monday, Apr 13, 2009

(By John MacArthur)

I have in my library a book by the spiritual father of a quasi-Christian cult. It argues that structured doctrine and systematized theology are contrary to the spirit of Jesus’ ministry.

The idea that Christ is anti-doctrine is a foundational belief of that cult. But no idea is further from the truth. The word doctrine simply means “teaching.” And it’s ludicrous to say that Christ is anti-teaching. The central imperative of His Great Commission is the command to teach (Matthew 28:18-20).

Unfortunately, cultists aren’t alone in their bias against doctrine. Some evangelicals have almost the same perspective. Because they view doctrine as heady and theoretical, they dismiss it as unimportant, divisive, threatening, or simply impractical.

People often ask why I emphasize doctrine so much. Now and then someone tells me frankly that my preaching needs to be less doctrinal and more practical.

Of course, practical application is vital. I don’t want to minimize its importance. But if there is a deficiency in preaching today, it is that there’s too much relational, pseudopsychological, and thinly life-related content, and not enough emphasis on sound doctrine.

The distinction between doctrinal and practical truth is artificial; doctrine is practical! In fact, nothing is more practical than sound doctrine.

The pastor who turns away from preaching sound doctrine abdicates the primary responsibility of an elder: “holding fast the faithful word which is in accordance with the teaching, that he will be able both to exhort in sound doctrine and to refute those who contradict” (Titus 1:9). We teach truth, we teach error, or we teach nothing at all.

Building on the Truth

Practical insights, gimmicks, and illustrations mean little if they’re not attached to divine principle. There’s no basis for godly behavior apart from the truth of God’s Word. Before the preacher asks anyone to perform a certain duty, he must first deal with doctrine. He must develop his message around theological themes and draw out the principles of the texts. Then the truth can be applied.

Romans provides the clearest example. Paul doesn’t give any exhortation until he has given eleven chapters of theology.

He scales incredible heights of truth, culminating in 11:33-36, where he says, “Oh, the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are His judgments and unfathomable His ways! For who has known the mind of the Lord, or who became His counselor? Or who has first given to Him that it might be paid back to him again? For from Him and through Him and to Him are all things. To Him be the glory forever. Amen.”

Then in chapter 12, he turns immediately to the practical consequences of the doctrine of the first 11 chapters. No passage in Scripture captures the Christian’s responsibility in the face of truth more clearly than Romans 12:1-2.

Resting on eleven chapters of profound doctrine, Paul calls each believer to a supreme act of spiritual worship — giving oneself as a living sacrifice. Doctrine gives rise to dedication to Christ, the greatest practical act. And the remainder of the book of Romans goes on to explain the many practical outworkings of one’s dedication to Christ.

He follows the same pattern in Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, and 1 Thessalonians. The doctrinal message comes first. Upon that foundation he builds the practical application, making the logical connection with the word therefore (Romans 1:1; Galatians 5:1; Ephesians 4:1; Philippians 2:1) or then (Colossians 3:1; 1 Thessalonians 4:1).

Living by the Truth

We have imposed an artificial meaning on the word doctrine. We’ve made it something abstract and threatening, unrelated to daily living. That has brought about the disastrous idea that preaching and teaching are unrelated to living.

The scriptural concept of doctrine includes the entire message of the gospel — its teaching about God, salvation, sin, and righteousness. Those concepts are so tightly bound to daily living that the first-century mind did not see them as something separate from practical truth.

The New Testament church was founded on a solid base of doctrine. First Timothy 3:16 contains what many expositors believe is an early church hymn: “God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory” (KJV). There, in capsule form, is the basis of all Christian teaching. Without that, no practical application matters.

Departing from the Truth

The next few verses of 1 Timothy describe what happens when men depart from the basis of biblical truth: “Some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons, by means of the hypocrisy of liars seared in their own conscience as with a branding iron, men who forbid marriage and advocate abstaining from foods which God has created to be gratefully shared in by those who believe and know the truth” (4:1-3).

Lying, hypocrisy, a dulled conscience, and false religious practices all have roots in wrong doctrine.

No ministry activity is more important than rightly understanding and clearly proclaiming sound doctrine. In 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus, Paul commissions two young men to the ministry. His central theme is the importance of adhering to sound doctrine.

Paul charged Timothy: “In pointing out these things to the brethren, you will be a good servant of Christ Jesus, constantly nourished on the words of the faith and of the sound doctrine which you have been following” (1 Timothy 4:6). “Pay close attention to yourself and to your teaching,” Paul adds, “persevere in these things, for as you do this you will ensure salvation both for yourself and for those who hear you” (v. 16).

Titus 2:10 says we “adorn [or honor] the doctrine of God” by how we live. When it comes to affirming sound doctrine, what we do carries far more significance than what we say. That’s why it’s disastrous when a pastor, seminary professor, or any kind of Christian leader fails morally. The message he proclaims is that his doctrine becomes merely an intellectual exercise.

Hearing the Truth

True doctrine transforms behavior as it is woven into the fabric of everyday life. But it must be understood if it is to have its impact. The real challenge of the ministry is to dispense the truth clearly and accurately. Practical application comes easily by comparison.

No believer can apply truth he doesn’t know. Those who don’t know the Bible’s principles for marriage, divorce, family, childrearing, discipline, money, debt, work, service to Christ, responsibilities to the poor, care of widows, response to governments, eternal rewards, and other teachings will not be able to apply them.

Those who don’t’ know what the Bible teaches about salvation cannot be saved. Those who don’t know what the Bible teaches about holiness are incapable of dealing with sin. Thus they are unable to live fully to God’s glory and their own blessedness.

Posted by Pulpit Magazine   |  Tags Ministry, Theology

9 Responses to Doctrine IS Practical


Posted by William du Plooy   |  Monday, Apr 13, 2009   

This is yet another issue that boils forth from the lack of trust in the SUFFICIENCY of the Scriptures and the teachings thereof (As of the Very Word Devine; through knowledge; unto us concerning our lives and holiness - 2 Peter 1:2-4).

Teaching/Doctrine leads to: Knowledge (1 Corinthians 14:6; Ephesians 4:13; 2 Peter 1:5,etc) leads to: Trust or affirmation in/of knowledge leads to Faith leads to Action/Works (James).

It is even in scientific basics expressed as: Cause and Effect.
In Morality it is expressed in Truth/Beliefs lead to Core Values.

We simply must not fall prey to this lie of the Deceiver and allow room for false teachings and corrupt lives that flow out of weak and false teachings and beliefs; for the sake of the honor of our LORD whom Himself is "THE Truth".

Posted by David Moore   |  Monday, Apr 13, 2009   

It's this very de-emphasis of doctrine that causes people like Chuck Colson and Billy Graham to laud the pope and state that we and Catholics believe 'basically the same thing'!

Posted by D. L. Kane   |  Monday, Apr 13, 2009   

After reading the past weeks posts, it seems clear to me that there may be some confusion in terms of how God uses “doctrine” in terms of justification versus sanctification.

Perhaps the answer to the following question might add some clarity:

How much “doctrine” must be taught in order for the Holy Spirit to convict a man of sin and reconcile Him to God?

As John MacArthur stated in a previous post, ““Those who don’t know what the Bible teaches (doctrine) about salvation cannot be saved. Those who don’t know what the Bible teaches about holiness are incapable of dealing with sin. Thus they are unable to live fully to their own blessedness and God’s glory.” And, in a subsequent post, stated, “But the central teachings of Scripture (in particular, those things related to the way of salvation) are so simple and so clear that even a child can understand.”

It seems clear (based on John’s own statements) that the Gospel message (doctrine) that God uses to “justify” a person is so simple that a “child can understand”--not a great deal of “teaching” (doctrine) required. Thus, doctrine (as described by John as “teaching”) is primarily used by God to sanctify a believer.

This statement (from the previous post) is most perplexing, “Those who don’t know what the Bible teaches about holiness are incapable of dealing with sin.” It is my understanding that Christ dealt with sin (justification) and doctrine (teaching on holiness) is God’s means for sanctifying the saints so that while they are on earth they live lives that bring glory to God.

Clarification would be appreciated, as I feel that John’s previous posts could be easily misunderstood by many. I am pretty certain it was just a case of being careless with words.

Posted by Jeff Brown   |  Tuesday, Apr 14, 2009   

A very good book on this subject is "Don't Stop Believing: Why Living Like Jesus Is Not Enough," by Michael E. Wittmer.

Posted by Charles E Whisnant   |  Tuesday, Apr 14, 2009   

Having learned that Paul spent 11 chapters talking about doctrine, then the rest of the book on practical applications (Romans) we learn the point. Understand the teaching of Christ then the application will be better applied.

Posted by William du Plooy   |  Tuesday, Apr 14, 2009   

Dear D L Kane,

I would make the distinction as you have and believe that Pastor MacArthur would also.

Even sharing the simplicity of the Gospel of grace in a childlike format is "teaching/doctrine".

I believe that Doctrine is in everything we believe, say and that leads to our values, morals and actions.
Therefore even the knowledge of Salvation Doctrine is essential; but it is only the beginning of the New Creation's life in Christ; therefore (I believe) John's emphasis was just not clearly defined, but implied.
I guess the question we can ask is "How much doctrine is necessary for Salvation?" and then "How much doctrine is necessary for Sanctification?". Having heard testimonies from mentally impaired Downs-Syndrome brothers and sisters in Christ; I know that their Justification and Sanctification is much more "childlike" and simple; in that they trust the Teachings of Christ much more readily than say a Professor of Theology. Yet the Doctrines as still necessary, first as "milk" and then as "meat", but there will be spiritual growth and hunger for the deep things of God in any transformed heart, no matter their mental state.

Luke 14:25-35
"Now great multitudes went with Him. And He turned and said to them, “If anyone comes to Me and does not hate his father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters, yes, and his own life also, he cannot be My disciple. And whoever does not bear his cross and come after Me cannot be My disciple. For which of you, intending to build a tower, does not SIT DOWN FIRST AND COUNT THE COST, whether he has enough to finish it— lest, after he has laid the foundation, and is not able to finish, all who see it begin to mock him, saying, ‘This man began to build and was not able to finish’? Or what king, going to make war against another king, does not SIT DOWN FIRST AND CONSIDER whether he is able with ten thousand to meet him who comes against him with twenty thousand? Or else, while the other is still a great way off, he sends a delegation and asks conditions of peace. So likewise, whoever of you DOES NOT FORSAKE ALLl that he has cannot be My disciple.

“Salt is good; but if the salt has lost its flavor, how shall it be seasoned? It is neither fit for the land nor for the dunghill, but men throw it out. He who has ears to hear, let him hear!”"

Herein Chist challenges us to have Information and Knowledge about Him (His Person and Work in our behalf) AND the consequences of Laying down ourselves to deny ourselves and follow Him. This implies a Foundational understanding which requires some form of Teaching from the Scriptures (As this is where we gain such knowledge and information) and some anaylysis of Christian living and tribulations (As we observe those who have gone before us into the Kingdom - Whether there already or sytill here with us.).

I am a very analytical person and would assume that each of us has different abilities to process information, to analyse it and then to work out what is the best position for ourselves and or others in any given discision. I believe that Christ imlies here a responsibility to do this carefully and responsibly according with the Doctrines of Scripture, especially relating to Salvation and Sanctification as One Whole (How that works out in each individual who is called; is so diverse that I believe we cannot nail that down entirely; but we can assume that the process is similar - but perhaps with differing levels and amounts of data required to assure the individual that commitment and trust is real and true - By the Power of the Spirit of grace and truth applying that is the LORD has foreordained.)

I hope that these thoughts are somewhat clear and helpful?

Your servant for the glory of our Triune Great I AM Alone,
W

Posted by D. L. Kane   |  Tuesday, Apr 14, 2009   

I hate to be a dog on a bone, but the statement below, as well as, several others, can easily be misunderstood by laymen and the unlearned and mimicked by them as a “requirement” for genuine salvation. That is my concern.

“Those who don’t know what the Bible teaches about salvation cannot be saved.”

Imagine this played out in real life: Someone comes to you and tells you that some man shared the gospel with them at Starbucks and for the first time in their life, they believe! That they finally understand that they are a sinner and that Christ died for their sins and was raised so that all who belief on Him will have their sins forgiven and they will be reconciled to God through Christ. They tell you that they were broken by this message and have bowed down to Christ as their Lord and Savior and that their only desire from this point forward is to love Him and follow Him for the rest of their life on earth.

So you say to them, “Oh really? Do you know what the bible teaches about salvation?” There answer could very well be, “NO. I have never stepped into a church and I have never read the Bible.” And you then say to them, “Well then you cannot be saved”.
It is not the Bible that saves; and, it is not knowledge that saves—it is God who saves and when He does he opens up our eyes and hearts and gives us understanding, regardless of whether we have heard a simple true Gospel message or have sat in a pew under a great teacher for 55 years.

Posted by Khoa Ngo   |  Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009   

Dear Mr. Kane

In regards to your comment about
“Those who don’t know what the Bible teaches about salvation cannot be saved.”
In your story from the beginning of it the man found out what the Bible taught about salvation
and i quote "that some man shared the gospel with them"
Although the man never read the Bible, he was taught from a person about what the Bible teaches about salvation; so therefore one would conclude that he knew what the Bible teaches about salvation, of course this all falls in the line of God's grace in opening his heart to receive it and accept what the Bible teaches about salvation.
If i am mistaken please correct me.

In Christ
K

Posted by D. L. Kane   |  Wednesday, Apr 15, 2009   

Dear Khoa Ngo,

Thank you for your insightful comment. First, I do feel compelled to tell you that I am not a "Mr." I am a 48 year old woman; and, secondly; My point was that the bible from Gensis to Revelation, "teaches about salvation" and therefore to make a statement that can me easily misunderstood is dangerous. If, he had said, "Those who think that they are saved and have been assured that they are, but do not know the Christ of the Bible, they ae not saved", I would have had no concern whatsoever.

What I have started to do when someone tells me that they are "saved"; or, that they are a "Christian"; or that they "believe"--I ask them one question--"Tell me about this Christ that you believe in". I have found many (even those who have been raised in the "church" and "know" what the bible teaches about "salvation") get really quite when I ask that question.

Hope this helps.



You must login to add a comment




New To The Fellowship?


Please click the sign up button below to create your free Shepherds' Fellowship Account