Preaching and the Clock

Pulpit Magazine December 8, 2009

(By John MacArthur)

Today’s post adapted from the Q&A section of Rediscovering Expository Preaching (Nelson, 1997).

How long should a sermon be?

As long as it takes to cover the passage adequately! I do not think the length of the sermon is as important as its content. At times I have preached fifty minutes and it has been ten minutes too long. Other times, I have preached an hour and twenty-five minutes and it has been just right. The important thing is to cover the main point so that people are convinced of its truth and comprehend its requirements. If you have nothing worthwhile to say, even twenty minutes will seem like an eternity to your people. If you are interesting, they will stay with you. Do not mistake persuasion for long-windedness, however. If you preach longer than you should, you will sacrifice persuasiveness.

I am convinced that biblical exposition requires at least forty minutes. Less than this just is not sufficient to probe the text deeply. If it takes fifteen to twenty minutes to give the setting, ten to fifteen minutes to draw out the principles, five to ten minutes to cross-reference them, and five to ten minutes for a conclusion, you already have about fifty minutes. Rarely does a man preaching twenty-five to thirty minutes do doctrinal exposition.

That is why developing the logical flow of a sermon is crucial. If your message is clearly outlined and you lead your people through the process of discovery, you will hold their attention. Your sermon must be going somewhere. You cannot merely give a number of assorted truths unrelated to each other. If your sermon lacks interest because it is disjointed, your people will lose interest.

If you are going to be a Bible expositor, forget the twenty- and thirty-minute sermons. You are looking at forty or fifty minutes. In any less than that, you can’t exposit the Scripture. The purpose of a sermon is not to get it over, but rather to explain the Word of God. My goal is not accomplished because I am brief. My goal is accomplished when I am clear and I have exposited the Word of God.

Won’t people get bored if you preach too long in the same book?

I think people will be bored if you are boring. It is not related to how much time you spend in a book. As long as you are saying things that capture their interest and challenge their lives, they will not care what book you are in or for how long.

I think, however, that a balance is desirable. If you are preaching through a heavily doctrinal book like Romans or Hebrews, it is good to give your people a break from that periodically. If you are preaching through one of the Gospels, such may not be necessary. When I preached through Matthew over an eight-year period, I rarely felt the need to take a break. Matthew contains such a mixture of doctrinal passages, parables, and narrative passages that it changes pace frequently on its own.

At times, too, you will need to deal with a specific topic. You may find that people in your church are being influenced by an unbiblical teaching that you must combat. Or they may be confused over a Bible passage or a theological issue. Also, you may occasionally see a need to preach about the biblical view of a significant world event. In general, though, preaching through a book will not bore people if you are an interesting preacher. This is the purest form of expository preaching.

9 Responses to
Comment Avatar
1 Robert Wood Tue, Dec 8, 2009 04:55.09 AM

Amen. I could listen to John for hours on end, as I usually do several hours a day while working. Pastor MacArthur is right that as long as someone is a good speaker the sermon will hold their attention however long it is.

Reply
Comment Avatar
2 William du Plooy Tue, Dec 8, 2009 06:43.89 AM

I second Robert,

The skill of expoition is to bring the Culture, Original Languages, Grammatical points, History and other Heremenuetic principles together to bring us into the Context of the Original writers and hearers.

This Alone is a sufficient cause for enjoying proper Exposition of the Scriptures in and of itself - let alone the skill or lack of the expositor...
If the CONTENT is searching the depths and riches of what God the Holy Spirit means to say in a Book or Passage; I believe we the flock will gladly bear with the weaknesses of the Preacher and will be drawn into the original context through the proper application of the hermeneutics.
And if we do love the LORD - we will love His Revelation in the Holy Scriptures equally and He will create within us the desire for the waters and bread that never stops to satisfy... Indeed I lament the lack of time spent in preaching, let alone the lack of True Exposition and I also believe that we then lack a proper use of the LORD's Day in Door-to-door and Open-Air evangelism in most Churches - unlike the cults who are ferverently active...
Do we realize that the Word is not just for sanctification but that we are charged as watchemn over the souls of those on the path to destruction? (Ezekiel, Jonah and Jeremiah to name a only some of the Books that make this point very clear).

Let us soak in the Word richly and then strive to be Wellsprings of life unto the dead...

Your fellow bondslave with the Gospel of Mercy and Peace Alone in the merit and work of Christ Alone,
W
Sometimes

Reply
Comment Avatar
3 William du Plooy Tue, Dec 8, 2009 06:45.59 AM

Colossians 3:16
"Let the word of Christ DWELL IN YOU RICHLY in all wisdom, teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord."

Reply
Comment Avatar
4 Randall Kirkland Tue, Dec 8, 2009 09:07.67 AM

I dearly appreciate John's clear, powerful, diligent handling of God's inerrant Word, and am indebted to him for anything I know about teaching the Word.

Having said that, something short of Acts 20:7 is a good practical "boundary" for comprehensive exposition of the Word.

Reply
Comment Avatar
5 Chris Cookston Tue, Dec 8, 2009 10:06.57 AM

comment was removed by user

Reply
Comment Avatar
6 russell harris Tue, Dec 8, 2009 04:59.67 PM

Sadly, Protestantism has embraced the concept of "sermon", and generally to the exclusion of verse-by-verse teaching of the Scripture.

The traditional sermon is based upon a specific, single verse or passage of Scripture, which almost invariably is taken out of context, with no notice given to other passages which pertain to the same subject. In many instances, the Scripture text upon a sermon is based is but a pretense, having no purpose other than to provide an introduction to a subject upon which the preacher wishes to rant. Though typically specious, the sermon generally is lacking in substance.

Many Protestants never have known the blessing of a competent pastor who understands his primary responsibility to be that which is described in Ephesians 4:11-16 and John 21:15-17, namely, that of feeding the sheep that they might progress from babe at the mother's breast to maturity. Such a pastor eschews the "sermon" and instead teaches a Bible class whenever the congregation assembles.

With a Bible class, the primarily consideration should be how long most members of the congregation can sit and concentrate without a restroom break; from this perspective, a class of forty-five minutes is about right, with an occasional excursion to an hour being permissible.

And with a Bible class, there is relatively little concern regarding matters such as setting, principles, cross-references, and conclusion; instead, the point at which the teacher happens to be when the bell rings is the point at which he begins in the next class, whether the next meeting is the day after tomorrow or a week from today. Because of the blessing of pen and paper, there is no need to squander precious class-time in review at the start of each class. Those who are serious about attaining an understanding the Word of God simply look over their notes before each class; those who cannot be bothered to take notes do not matter.

The great need of a congregation is to be shown -- accurately and in detail -- the meaning of the text of the Scripture; that knowledge in the yielded heart is the stuff which the Spirit of God requires in order to bring about change within the individual.

Reply
Comment Avatar
7 Chris Cookston Wed, Dec 9, 2009 08:10.98 AM

Russell:

I think you are right, Protestants have embraced a sad definition of what a sermon is. And for what it is worth I think your third paragraph is a solid commentary on the many church goers today. I was in a fellowship for a few years, attended their school and then came to the conclusion that most of the pastors in that group did not even preach. They would stand up, read a verse or two, I would then get real excited thinking that they were going to exegete that passage but (usually) they did not. They took one or two words out of context and bridged into an illustration and then application and then they went and found another verse and did the same with it too. Their sermons were heavily based on having a cute outline with main headings that either rhymed or made alliteration or whatever. I would say to myself, "how hard is it to just explain the English Bible to your people?"

Practically speaking your comment on the length of presentation is wise. Basically, everyone needs to get up after about an hour...that seems to be the norm in our culture. I guess for me, in the end, I don't really ask of the preaching moment, did this guy preach long enough? But rather, did this guy preach the Word of God with good solid exposition, theology and implication? And from my experience, I just can't see how a preacher can really do that without at least 30 minutes of preaching time.

Reply
Comment Avatar
8 russell harris Wed, Dec 9, 2009 09:48.92 AM

Chris,

In the university environment, the nominal hour-long class (actually 50 minutes) is the rule, and is sufficient for complex subjects such as calculus, physics, and chemistry. But this supposes an on-going train of thought which, though interrupted by the bell, continues in the next class session, continuity being provided by the combination of textbook and notes. Conversely, the traditional Protestant sermon almost always is a stand-alone presentation which is independent of the sermons of last week and next.

A related matter is the case of the pastor who holds Bible class more than three or four times a week. While at first glance, such a regimen may appear profitable, it actually is quite dangerous, for it affords the congregation no opportunity to give careful consideration to the stream of teaching, Acts 17:10-11. In such a situation, the congregation has no alternative but to accept uncritically everything which the pastor says; and while the assertions of the pastor may be repeated, no one dares discuss them. But this is the essential characteristic of a cult; the congregation is being indoctrinated, rather than educated and edified.

Reply
Comment Avatar
9 Chris Cookston Wed, Dec 9, 2009 04:16.39 PM

Russell:

Thanks for your feedback. According to your description, I would fall into the "non-traditional" category of sermon planning and preparation. This is because I teach through books of the Bible going verse-by-verse. So I pick up where I left off last week, its ongoing and many in the congregation study deeper along with me and even ahead of where I am teaching. I am finding that people are really excited about learning more from God's Word, they want to know what it means and are willing to give it some effort. Also, this way Christ is leading our church through the Word of God.

Your point about the pastor holding Bible class frequently is good, I think even some of us who are not trying to indoctrinate can easily spread the minds of our people a bit too thin with so many services and Bible studies. For the Christian who studies, two lessons a week are sufficient. Other wise it can be in one ear and out the other with little spiritual nourishment.

Thanks for writing Russell, May the Lord bless you!

Reply
You must be logged in to add a comment click here to log in